Brand & Marketing
Founders tend to spend too much on brand too early, or too little and look like a side project. Here's the minimum a pre-launch product actually needs, what it costs in the UK in 2026, and what can safely wait.
The first is over-investing. A pre-revenue startup spends £40,000 and three months on a brand system with twelve logo lockups, a custom typeface, and a sixty-page guidelines document, for a product five people have used. The brand is beautiful and the runway is shorter.
The second is under-investing, then paying for it in credibility. A landing page built from a free template, a logo made in an afternoon, three different shades of blue across the site and the deck. Prospects and investors read that instantly as “not serious yet,” and it quietly caps what you can charge.
The right answer for almost every first launch sits between the two: enough brand to look like a real company, not so much that you're polishing an identity for a product that might pivot.
The word gets used for three different things, and conflating them is where budgets go wrong.
The pre-launch minimum, in priority order:
None of the following is wrong to want. All of it is fine to postpone until you have paying customers and a product that's stopped moving:
| Package | Rough 2026 cost | What's included |
|---|---|---|
| Starter identity | £1,500 to £5,000 | Logo suite, colour and type, a one-page mini guide, a few templates. Light or no strategy. |
| Identity with strategy | £5,000 to £15,000 | Positioning and messaging work, a full visual system, core templates, a short guidelines doc. The right band for most funded startups. |
| Full brand programme | £15,000+ | Deep research, naming, a complete system, illustration or motion, full guidelines, rollout across every touchpoint. |
Remember that the identity is only part of the bill. Once it exists you have to apply it: the website, the deck, the templates, the social profiles. Budget for that, or you'll have a lovely logo sitting on top of an inconsistent everything-else.
If you only spend real money on one thing, spend it on getting the positioning right. A business with a clear, credible brand is read as more professional and more trustworthy, and that directly supports higher prices and an easier fundraise. A prettier logo does not move those numbers. A sharper answer to “what is this and who is it for” does.
This is also why we run brand and product discovery close together. The one-sentence product definition and the one-sentence positioning line are nearly the same artefact.
Concretely, good positioning work produces a few things you'll use every week: the one-line description, a short list of who the product is not for, three or four proof points you can stand behind, and the two or three competitors you're really being compared against, with a sentence on how you differ from each. None of that is visual. All of it changes how you sell.
A realistic mid-range engagement for a startup a few months from launch, to make the number concrete:
That's a brand that looks like a funded company and can be applied by a two-person team without a designer on call. It is deliberately not a full programme, and that's the point at this stage.
Rebrand when the positioning has genuinely changed: a new market, a new product, a merger, or a name that now actively works against you. Do not rebrand because the team has looked at the logo for two years and is bored of it. Your customers have seen it far less than you have, and every rebrand resets a little of the recognition you've built.
If the itch is real but the positioning hasn't moved, the usual honest fix is a refresh rather than a rebrand: tighten the logo, modernise the palette and type, redo the templates, keep the name and the core equity. That's a fraction of the cost and it doesn't ask your existing customers to re-learn who you are.
If you're about to launch and you're not sure your brand is pulling its weight, tell us what you're building. We'll tell you what's worth doing now and what to leave until you have traction. Our branding work is scoped that way on purpose.
Sasha
Sasha works on brand and identity, and thinks most rebrands are solving a problem that was really about positioning.
Turn an idea into a product, brand, or campaign, with one team from strategy to launch.
start a projectEngineering
The best tech stack for a first build is a boring one: proven, well-documented, and easy to hire for. Here's what “boring” actually means in 2026, the traps that sink second years, and a sensible default to start from.
11 Sep 2026 · 10 min read
Regulated Products
You rarely need your own licence to launch a payments or e-money product. Here are the routes that let you go live in weeks instead of a year, what you still own, and the safeguarding change landing in May 2026.
8 Sep 2026 · 11 min read
Product Strategy
Every founder asks it, and “it depends” is a useless answer. Here's the real 2026 range for a UK build, the five things that actually set your number, how offshore and native change it, and the three places budgets quietly leak.
2 Sep 2026 · 11 min read